Your warehouse manager swears by UHF RFID. Your IT team insists HF is better for accuracy. Meanwhile, pallets pile up, and workers waste hours rescanning items. The truth? Neither tech is “better”—they’re built for different jobs. Let’s settle the UHF vs. HF debate once and for all, so you can stop guessing and start optimizing.
Break-Even Tip: If scanning >1,000 items/day, UHF saves labor costs.
5. Maintenance and Downtime
UHF:
Frequent Adjustments: Re-aim antennas as inventory stacks change.
Dust Sensitivity: Blow out antennas monthly.
HF:
Plug-and-Play: Rarely needs repositioning.
Battery Hassles: Handheld HF models need daily charging.
6. How to Test Without Wasting Cash
Rent Both: Test UHF and HF readers for a week (200–500).
Tag 100 Items: Mix pallets, small parts, and metal-cased goods.
Track Errors: Missed scans, speed, and worker frustration.
Cykeo Hack: Their hybrid readers let you toggle between UHF/HF modes for testing.
Takeaway: UHF RFID readers rule speed and scale; HF conquers precision and chaos. If your warehouse moves mountains of pallets, go UHF. If you track tiny, expensive parts in metal mazes, choose HF. Still stuck? Test both. Your workflow—not sales reps—should decide.
Discover the 5 critical tests to ensure your RFID readers survive harsh environments. Cykeo shares expert insights on durability, performance, and cost-effective rugged RFID technology.
Discover how handheld RFID readers optimize logistics tracking with mobile scanning, automated sorting, and cargo identification, enhancing supply chain visibility and operational efficiency.
Discover whether RFID or barcode scanners are faster for logistics. Compare bulk scanning speeds, error rates, and use cases for warehouses and shipping hubs.