All RFID Product
When people ask me “RFID vs NFC — which one should I pick?”, my first instinct is to ask back: Where’s your bottleneck — is it transaction speed, read range, or just pure cost per unit?
Because honestly, most blog posts out there oversimplify it into:
Both RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) and NFC (Near Field Communication) are cousins in the contactless family — they use electromagnetic fields to exchange data.
But specs on paper rarely tell you that in a real dock-side receiving area in Yiwu, with 14 pallets on a forklift, your NFC reader will basically give up after the second box.
I’ve been in projects where Cykeo’s UHF RFID tunnel readers replaced manual barcode scans in a garment factory.
Numbers looked like this:
NFC just isn’t built for that volume. Yes, it’s secure and reliable for point transactions, but for supply chain — you need throughput. RFID can read 300–500 tags in one pass, even if some are hidden in cartons.
And I’ll admit — sometimes RFID overreads.
Cykeo’s engineers once had to set up shielding panels in a client’s Shenzhen distribution hub because the dock door reader was picking up tags from goods still in the staging area 7 meters away.
This is where fine-tuning power levels, antenna orientation, and even tag placement (left sleeve seam on garments works better than collar) comes into play. NFC, with its short range, never has that problem.
If you’re running a boutique store in Paris and only need to authenticate 200 handbags a day, NFC tags at €0.15 each + phone-based readers make sense.
But if you’re in a 40,000 m² warehouse in Rotterdam, you’ll burn that budget in labor hours if you skip RFID.
Cykeo’s UHF readers, like their C900 fixed reader paired with panel antennas, can be integrated with WMS via standard REST APIs. It’s not plug-and-play like swiping a phone, but once it’s set up, the ROI is obvious.
If NFC is a handshake, RFID is a crowd scan.
You don’t use a handshake to count people in a stadium — same logic here.
For asset tracking, inventory management, production lines — go RFID.
For payments, customer interaction, secure access control — go NFC.
And if you’re tempted to “use both,” I’d say: do it only if you have a marketing or UX reason, not because you’re afraid of choosing wrong.
Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | RFID (UHF) | NFC |
|---|---|---|
| Typical Range | 3–10 m | 2–10 cm |
| Read Speed | 300+ tags/sec | 1 tag at a time |
| Best For | Warehousing, logistics, production | Payments, single-item authentication |
| Hardware Cost | Higher upfront, lower long-term | Low upfront, higher labor cost |
| Scalability | High | Low to medium |
Project: Cykeo RFID-enabled warehouse upgrade, Milan, Italy
Setup:
Chipless RFID is considered the next-generation RFID technology due to its low cost and environmental advantages. But can it truly replace traditional RFID? This article analyzes its potential and limitations from aspects like reading distance, da...
More
Learn how to prevent RFID signal interference with handheld scanners. Discover solutions for metal environments, frequency conflicts, and optimal antenna placement.
More
Discover how RFID readers prevent costly errors in manufacturing workflows, from parts tracking to quality control. Learn about precision-driven solutions for industrial automation.
More
Learn how to integrate RFID modules with edge AI processors for instant data insights. Discover setup tips, use cases, and Cykeo’s hybrid solutions.
More
Cykeo RFID IoT Solution Products R&D Manufacturer
